Consistency in Documentation: Presentation Server VS Engage Server
Lars: Things are partly still named presentation instead of engage
Basil: From my point of view, "presentation" is working better as a node type than "engage". It's not only the media module (Engage), which is running on that node, but also OAI-PMH and the feeds.
If we change that, then the documentation has to be changed as well. At the moment the server type is consistently named “Engage Server”. If we switch to “Presentation Server” instead, we should need to change that.
For the relevant parts of documentation, just grep in docs/guides/*
I've updated the docs (commit b76090bdef1f8d8604be0f6332e467b844cd5850). In most places, "engage" is still the right term as the docs are referring either to the player or the media module.
You maybe want to rename the RPM distributions as well and update these docs accordingly once you've done that change.
I do not really care as long as it is consistent
I can update the documentation where necessary. But do you agree with the argumentation that the node type should be better named "presentation" than "engage"?